Jesus died for and loves even those who are weeping and gnashing their teeth in hell?

"Jesus Loves You" signIn a recent exam in my daughter Rachel’s Bible class at her school for missionary children in the Philippines, there were these questions: “Who is redemption available to?” “Who is justification available to?” “Who is propitiation available to?” And Rachel’s answer to all of these was the same: “Those who believe that Jesus died to save us.” All three of her answers were marked wrong, because the teacher’s answers to all three were, “Everyone.” I’m proud of her.

These are questions that many evangelicals will answer, “Huh?” But, honestly, my reaction was the same, because the questions were vague at best. What does “available” mean here? If the teacher was asking who is redeemed, Rachel’s answer then was correct. Was the teacher asking if the offer of justification is made to everyone who hears the preaching of the true gospel? Rachel’s answer to this is still correct—only those who believe among all those who hear the gospel will be redeemed and justified and propitiated of their sin. If by “available” he meant that Christ’s death made salvation “possible” to everyone, then it has serious consequences to the Christian doctrine of salvation.

These questions and Rachel’s answer highlight the chasm between the Reformed and the Arminian. Arminians would always say “God loves everyone.” This is why all of their evangelism tracts open with something like this, “God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life.” Near Rachel’s school, there’s a building which has a huge sign on top saying, “Jesus Loves You.” I’ve always wondered how can any Christian tell that honestly to anyone whom they meet on the street. Do we know God’s mind and eternal decree? What if that person was not elect and was going to hell? Does God love him while he weeps and gnashes his teeth in unspeakable torture in eternal hell?

Arminians would usually answer that God loves him dearly, but it ‘s up to the person to exercise his free will to believe in Christ. If he does not believe, then he will suffer God’s wrath. So if Christ died for this person in hell, what becomes of Christ’s death on the cross for him: Useless! Makes no sense! Infinitely unfair to our Suffering Servant!

But this is exactly what Arminians really say. Christ’s sacrifice only made salvation possible—-“available,” according to Rachel’s teacher—to everyone, but not actually accomplished anything. So, did Christ come into the world for the purpose of actually saving all that the Father gave him? Or did He die merely to make salvation possible for everyone? If it’s the second case, then Christ’s death accomplished zip! Nothing!

Take a look at what the Bible says about what Jesus came to do and was able to accomplish on the cross:

  • Christ was born to save his people from sin (Matt 1:21).
  • Christ came into the world to save sinners (1 Tim 1:15).
  • Christ “made propitiation for sinners” (Heb 2:17).
  • Christ “secured an eternal redemption” (Heb 9:12).
  • God “sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins” (1 John 4:10).

If he did not accomplish his mission of saving his people from sin, was Jesus being truthful when he exclaimed as he was about to give up his spirit on the cross, “It is finished!”?

Share:

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

4 thoughts on “Jesus died for and loves even those who are weeping and gnashing their teeth in hell?”

  1. In some Arminian circles the doctrine of the sovereignty of the will of man is so central that anyone who would dare question it would be immediately labeled a rank heretic who follows John Calvin instead of “the Bible.”  On this and other issues, holding fast to the truth may put one at risk of going against the party line and falling out of favor with one’s peers, which may be an unpleasant experience, yet it is what the Lord calls us to do at times if we are going to be faithful to Him.  In addition to correct theology, this is an extremely important lesson for a young person to learn.  I would also say it is important to recognize when one is in a situation which will not allow for a fair discussion of the truth regarding a particular issue, and in which any attempt to have one will be met with fierce resistance by the powers that be.  In those cases, I would say one needs to be humble and self-disciplined in order to avoid bringing up the issue, and to look for positive, hopefully noncontroversial, ways to contribute to the activity.  We live in a fallen world, and we must be ready to contend with how it has affected or infected institutions which we hold dear.

  2. So did you talk to Rachel’s teacher?  I’d be interested in what he/she said.  Or did Rachel explain her answer?  Cuz’ that would be cool.

    1. At the beginning of the year, I requested an independent study for Rachel for her Bible class. The school admin denied this request, saying that the school strives to present a “balanced” and “fair” approach to doctrinal issues (I can’t remember the exact words.). What that actually means is that if a teacher presents the Baptist-Arminian-Dispensationalist view, he is “balanced” and “fair” and “flexible.” If he presents both sides of the coin, he is not. Years ago, a missionary of a Reformed denomination was told to be “flexible,” because he was presenting both sides.

      I believe one reason for this is that the teachers really do not have much of an idea what the Reformed faith is all about. They’ve heard some caricatures of it, but they really don’t know, and this is why they can’t present it. Much of what is presented is the baggage from one teacher to the next, not what Scriptures say.
      I was like that in my Arminian days. I learned no other teaching except Arminianism-Dispensationalism until I learned about the Reformed faith in midlife. It was a breath of fresh air!

Comments are closed.

Related Posts

From Psalms to Hymns to Rock Bands to …

The theological erosion of worship music is even worse when “contemporary” music arrived. These songs were written by mostly Biblically- and theologically-illiterate young men and women, even those in their early teens!

Are You a Frog in the Kettle?

Soon they will realize either that their faith in Christ is being challenged and will therefore seek a true church or, like the frog in the kettle, they may remain as their profession of faith is increasingly confused, weakened, and perhaps even abandoned.