“Always Reforming”: Always Re-forming?


Mainstream evangelicals who discover the Reformed wing of Christianity often want to color Reformed doctrine, worship and practice with their own baggage from their former brand of evangelicalism. Their rallying cry is, “reformed and always reforming.”

William Farel, John Calvin, Theodore Beza, John Knox
The Reformation Wall in Geneva (L to R): William Farel, John Calvin, Theodore Beza, John Knox (Click to enlarge)

Mark Driscoll is a great example of this. He’s one of those so-called YRR’s—Young, Restless and Reformed, the neo-Calvinists. Last year, in his website, he charged “old Calvinism” with funda-mentalism or even liberalism, and being “fearful of the Holy Spirit,” among other things.

Driscoll, being a YRB—Young, Restless and Bapticostal—has a beef against “cessationism,” the doctrine that extraordinary gifts bestowed by the Spirit on the apostles and their associates had ceased with the passing of the first century. These include, of course, speaking in tongues, instantaneous healing, casting out evil spirits, and other things Pentecostal and Charismatic.

It doesn’t matter that Calvin and Luther did not slay anyone in the spirit, or performed healing crusades, or preached in unknown tongues. They actually went to war against the heretical Anabaptists who taught and practiced these things. Like the Anabaptists, many evangelicals today have embraced their own brand of “reformation,” a brand-new “Calvinism,” but really know only predestination or TULIP at best.

Then they start using some common Reformed sayings such as the “priesthood of all believers,” “perseverance of the saints,” “always reforming,” and other sayings, but they don’t actually know what they mean. In his “Semper Reformanda” article, Michael Horton writes (all emphasis added):

But where did this phrase come from? Its first appearance was in a 1674 devotional by Jodocus van Lodenstein, who was an important figure in Dutch Reformed pietism — a movement known as the Dutch Second Reformation. According to these writers, the Reformation reformed the doctrine of the church, but the lives and practices of God’s people always need further reformation.

Van Lodenstein and his colleagues were committed to the teaching of the Reformed confession and catechism; they simply wanted to see that teaching become more thoroughly applied as well as understood. However, here is his whole phrase: “The church is reformed and always [in need of] being reformed according to the Word of God.” The verb is passive: the church is not “always reforming,” but is “always being reformed” by the Spirit of God through the Word. Although the Reformers themselves did not use this slogan, it certainly reflects what they were up to; that is, if one quotes the whole phrase!

Horton then explains what each clause in “Reformed and always Reforming” means:

First, the church is Reformed, and this should be written with a capitalized “R.” If it is true that Jesus rose from the dead two millennia ago in Palestine, then it is just as true in our time and place. The ecumenical creeds confess the faith that we all share across a multitude of cultures and eras. Similarly, the Reformed standards (such as the Three Forms of Unity and the Westminster Confession and Catechisms) summarize what Reformed Christians believe to be the clear teaching of God’s Word. Churches will always be changing in significant ways depending on their time and place, but these communal ways of confessing Christ remain faithful summaries of “the faith once and for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 3).

Our forebears who invoked this phrase had in mind the consolidation of catholic and evangelical Christianity embodied in the Reformed confessions and catechisms. There is a reason that this wing of the Reformation called itself “Reformed.” Unlike the Anabaptists, Reformed churches understood themselves as a continuing branch of the catholic church. At the same time, the Reformed wanted to reform everything “according to the Word of God.” Not only our doctrine but our worship and life must be determined by Scripture and not by human whim or creativity.

Interestingly, it is a mainline Presbyterian theologian, Anna Case-Winters, who brings attention to what she calls “our misused motto.” Winters points out that “in the 16th-century context the impulse it reflected was neither liberal nor conservative, but radical, in the sense of returning to the ‘root.’” This was reflected in the rallying cry, sola Scriptura (by Scripture alone). The Reformation had no interest in “change” as an end in itself.

The slogan is not just misused. It is also misquoted as “always reforming“—with a small “r”—instead of “always being Reformed,” with a capital “R.”

Some people today leave out the “Reformed” part or at least interpret it as “reformed” (little “r”): the church is “always being reformed according to the Word of God.” This means that to be Reformed is simply to be reformed and to be reformed is simply to be biblical. All who base their beliefs on the Bible are therefore “reformed,” regardless of whether their interpretations are consistent with the common confessions of the Reformed churches. However, this runs counter to the original intention of the phrase. Doubtless there are many beliefs and practices that Reformed believers share in common with non-Reformed believers committed to God’s Word. We must always remain open to correction from our brothers and sisters in other churches who have interpreted the Bible differently. Nevertheless, Reformed churches belong to a particular Christian tradition with its own definitions of its faith and practice. We believe that our confessions and catechisms faithfully represent the system of doctrine found in Holy Scripture. We believe that to be Reformed is not only to be biblical; to be biblical is to be Reformed.

Another great misuse of this slogan is that the last clause, “according to the Word of God,” is also usually left out.

As important as it is to keep “Reformed” in the phrase, an even more dangerous omission is often found among more liberal Protestants who also leave out the “according to the Word of God” clause. And usually it is “always reforming,” instead of “always being reformed.” In this view, the church is the active party, determining its own doctrine, worship, and discipline in the light of ever-changing cultural contexts. Progressivism becomes an end in itself and the church becomes a mirror of the world.

Yet those of us in confessional Reformed churches must also beware of forgetting that our doctrinal standards are subordinate to the Word of God. Christ’s church was reformed by God’s Word in the Reformation and post-Reformation era. It was brought back to God’s Word and the fruit of that great work of the Spirit continues to guide us through our confessions and catechisms. And yet the church is not only Reformed; it is always in need of being reformed. Like our personal sanctification, our corporate faithfulness is always flawed. We don’t need to move beyond the gains of the Reformation, but we do need further reformation. But here is where the last clause kicks in: “always being reformed according to the Word of God.”

It is not because the culture is always changing and we need to be up with the times, but because we are always in need of being re-oriented to the Word that stands over us, individually and collectively, that the church can never stand still. It must always be a listening church. “Faith comes by hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ” (Rom 10:17). Personally and corporately, the church comes into being and is kept alive by hearing the gospel. The church is always on the receiving end of God’s good gifts as well as His correction. The Spirit does not lead us apart from the Word but directs us back to Christ as He is revealed in Scripture. We always need to return to the voice of our Shepherd. The same gospel that creates the church sustains and renews it. Our personal conformity to the Word that Paul commands in Romans 12 is never completed in this life, and the same is true of the church in this present age.

Nevertheless, even when we, individually and as church, need to be always re-oriented to the Scripture because of sin, it doesn’t mean that we need to re-invent the wheels of doctrine, worship and practice with every wind of cultural change or passing fancy:

This perspective keeps us from making tradition infallible but equally from imbibing the radical Protestant obsession with starting from scratch in every generation. When God’s Word is the source of our life, our ultimate loyalty is not to the past as such or to the present and the future, but to “that Word above all earthly pow’rs,” to borrow from Luther’s famous hymn. Neither behind us nor ahead of us, but above us, reigns our sovereign Lord over His body in all times and places. When we invoke the whole phrase — “the church Reformed and always being reformed according to the Word of God” — we confess that we belong to the church and not simply to ourselves and that this church is always created and renewed by the Word of God rather than by the spirit of the age.

We need a Reformation today, not re-formation, because all of the Reformers’ doctrines are already clearly defined by the Reformed creeds and confessions.



Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

1 thought on ““Always Reforming”: Always Re-forming?”

Comments are closed.

Related Posts